Search for: "Mey v. Mey" Results 21 - 40 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2012, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
MEI, however, retained capacity to commence an action against Hurst, whose representation of MEI occurred prior to its dissolution (see Moran Enters., Inc. v Hurst, 66 AD3d 972). [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:33 am
Dismissal of the prior action insofar as asserted by MEI was upheld by this Court on the ground that MEI failed to appear by an attorney as required by CPLR 321(a) (see Moran v Hurst, 32 AD3d 909). [read post]
23 May 2016, 10:14 am by Karel Frielink
Karel Frielink (23 mei 2016) . [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 1:03 am by Vanessa Rieu
Dr Adair noted that the idea for granting such declarations dates back to the Arrow Generics v Merck case, concerning alendronate, about 10 years ago. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:09 am by Charles Sartain
  Answer: As many as they want, but the court will only use one, says King Operating et al v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:32 pm
Mei-Hsin Wang explained the Japanese and Korean systems, where data exclusivity derives from Post Marketing Surveillance (PMS). [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]