Search for: "Meyer v. Grant"
Results 21 - 40
of 393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2007, 7:56 am
In Paul Meyers v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
AC32692 Dissent - Meyers v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:03 am
Meyers did not comply with this deadline but instead wrote a letter after the deadline seeking an extension sine die for medical reasons, which was granted. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 11:48 am
McHenry—formerly, Texas Top Cop Shop v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
That was the case in Meier's Wine Cellars, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 9:32 am
As a result, the Court’s January 7, 2025 order granting preliminary relief is stayed pending the government’s appeal to the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
See Meyer v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
Inexplicably, without waiting for the officers’ response or for this second deadline to pass, the magistrate judge granted the officers’ motion to dismiss and entered judgment against Allen. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:23 pm
Reversing the grant of summary judgment below. [read post]
24 Dec 2024, 9:43 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction in the case of Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Gillette v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:40 am
The trial court granted JMM's motion, but permitted the plaintiff to amend the complaint.Regions Bank v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:11 pm
When Justice Aronson wrote this opinion for the Court of Appeal over two years ago, I promptly posted that this decision "puts a fair amount of bite" back into the 'vexatious litigant' provisions of CCP 391.3 by allowing the judge to weigh the evidence when deciding whether to require the plaintiff to post security, and argued that the California Supreme Court should grant review to resolve the split in the Court of Appeal and decide whether Justice Aronson was right.It… [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
Grant v Frank, 150 AD3d 706, 707). [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:03 am
Things that make something conspicuous (citing Meyer v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
This led the Judge to conclude that there was no evidence of InterDigital being forced by extensive hold-out to grant discounts of 60%, 70%, or 80% to the largest licensees. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:25 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Miller v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:43 am
Briefly: At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro and Randal John Meyer urge the Court to grant review in a case by a company dubbed “Uber in the sky. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 3:02 pm
(See Navarrete v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 6:42 am
I thought, for instance, that the Court would not grant cert in United States v. [read post]
