Search for: "Miceli v Miceli" Results 21 - 40 of 218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2020, 6:13 am by CMS
EP ‘287 and EP ‘163 concern methods for producing mice having a reverse chimeric human-mouse locus, and mice made in that way. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:57 am
On Friday, the Likelihood of Confusion blog observed that the verdict in the Man & Machine v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Last week the IPKat was too busy stuffing himself with chocolate mice to notice the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Case C 276/05, The Wellcome Foundation Ltd v Paranova Pharmazeutika Handels GmbH, a reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Austrian Oberster Gerichtshof in May 2005 -- which is a longer time ago than most Kats can remember. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 6:52 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Kymab was producing its own genetically modified mice, with a similar genetic structure to Regeneron’s mice. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:19 am by Giles Peaker
Ojo & Ojo v London Borough of Hackney. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 5:44 am by Law Lady
NIPRO DIABETES SYSTEMS, INC., and NIPRO MEDICAL CORPORATION, Appellees. 4th District.Jurisdiction -- Service of process -- Defects -- Non-final order determining that motion to quash service was moot affirmed -- Before trial court rules on pending motion to quash re-service of process, it must determine validity of original service of processJOSEPH MICELI and MARIA MICELI, Appellants, v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:55 am
Lunin shares with his wife, four cats, three dogs, two mice and one rabbit sits across the road from a compound of the Federal Security Service, or F.S.B., the post-Soviet incarnation of the K.G.B.... 'This will be my own little country and I will be its Putin,' [Lunin] explained during a recent visit along with his wife to their [7.4 acres of] land.... 'I was free under Brezhnev and am free under Putin,' he said. 'I am free inside.'""'Here I Can… [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 8:03 am
The Court of Appeal heard arguments regarding whether, if they had accepted Kymab's construction of "in situ replacement", they could nevertheless have found infringement on the basis of Actavis v Eli Lilly (Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48, IPKat post). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Meyers v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:04 am by Rose Hughes
The Board of Appeal, however, noted the correlation between the titre of the anti-α-SN antibodies present in the tissue of the mice and the average reduction in α-SN aggregates in the mice. [read post]