Search for: "Michael Amaral"
Results 21 - 40
of 288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2015, 10:01 pm
Amaral’s attorney Michael A. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Before teaching, Professor Amar spent a few years at the firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
., selective service conscription).In this regard, harken back to what another prominent constitutional scholar, Akhil Amar (my older brother), wrote about Obamacare in 2012: The next terrorist attack might very well be biological. . . . [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 12:22 pm
I would add that these include theories advanced by liberal originalists like Jack Balkin and Akhil Amar, as well as conservatives such as Michael McConnell (whose originalist rationale for Brown is mentioned by Ramsey). [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 7:20 pm
Contents include:Special Issue: Racial Capitalism and International Economic LawJames Thuo Gathii & Ntina Tzouvala, Racial Capitalism and International Economic Law: Introduction Donatella Alessandrini, Johanna del Pilar Cortes-Nieto, Luis Eslava & Anil Yilmaz Vastardis, The Dream of Formality: Racialization Otherwise and International Economic Law Ntina Tzouvala, Full Protection and Security (for Racial Capitalism) Michael Fakhri, Markets, Sovereignty, and Racialization Ernesto… [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am
On this topic, I aim to describe America’s actual Constitution, written and unwritten, not Amar’s utopian Constitution. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze the essential issues raised in Spokeo v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
(Jim Lindgren) Michael Stern has a thoughtful post at PointofOrder.com on the arrest clause of the Wisconsin and US constitutions.He argues (in part): As Akil Amar and Neal Katyal note in a 1995 law review article, modern cases have given the arrest clause such a narrow construction as to make it a “virtual nullity. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:16 pm
Gregory Ablavsky authored a critical review of Akhil Amar's book, The Words That Made Us. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
When doctors consider whether to administer a particular medical treatment, they have to balance the treatment’s efficacy (that is, how likely the treatment is to help the patient, and by how much) against negative side effects (that is, how likely the treatment is to harm the patient, and how badly). [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
How Seriously to Take Mismatch Theory We stress (and one of us, Dean Amar, has written over the years) that we do not believe the case for mismatch theory has been empirically made; there is scholarship going both ways, and much more scholarship to be done. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
(For more background on these, and many other, reasons why ISL has no merit, readers can consult a recent law review article I co-wrote with my brother Professor Akhil Amar that was published four months ago. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:46 am
Michael B. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
For many practical purposes, we all must accept the meaning of the Constitution to be what the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
With many eyes this week on the Ninth Circuit litigation challenging President Trump’s Executive Order regulating entry into the U.S. by nationals of seven Middle Eastern and African countries, less noticed but potentially as important is a separate lawsuit (San Francisco v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
by Michael M. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
Founding history and past practice (especially the additions of Kentucky and West Virginia) would suggest that the answer to this is clearly yes, but some scholars (most elaborately Michael Paulsen) have pointed out that Article IV’s text and punctuation could easily be read to mean that while new states can be formed out of the territory formerly belonging to two or more states, a single state cannot be carved up into multiple ones.Would the people (or their representatives) of each… [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm
What to Expect in This Justia Webinar In this highly anticipated program, Dean Amar and Professor Dorf will engage in a thought-provoking exploration of the Supreme Court’s most recent term. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Part One, in the space below, we offer some reactions to the doctrinal analyses presented in a recent essay by Verdict columnist Michael Dorf. [read post]
