Search for: "Michael J. James v. State of Maine" Results 21 - 40 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
Frederick, MD : Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2012 KF 156 W585 2012 V.2 The Wolters Kluwer Bouvier law dictionary / Stephen Michael Sheppard, general editor. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
The only remaining case – which will now be tried on 27 February 2012 – is that brought by Charlotte, James and Maria Church. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:15 am by Adam Faderewski
James Michael Lynch, 73, of Wood River, Illinois, died November 21, 2019. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
He credits them (specifically, Michael McConnell) with having changed his mind about a number of important legal issues, in particular, the constitutionality of vouchers (used for religious school tuition), which he came to regard as not unconstitutional or as nonjusticiable—that is, an issue for the legislatures, not the courts, to decide. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am by Jordan Brunner
The reports come a day after Michael Flynn was forced to resign as National Security Adviser after lying about conversations he had with the Russian ambassador to the United States before the inauguration. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Michael Geist has examined the case of Google v. [read post]