Search for: "Michael S. Anderson" Results 21 - 40 of 1,506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
“What’s dividing the Justices (and other initial reactions to the Court’s decision in Trump v. Anderson)”
5 Mar 2024, 6:51 pm by Howard Bashman
At “Dorf on Law,” Michael C. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
Payments News Update – March 1, 2024
1 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Michelle
OCC’s Hsu Calls for Federal Payments LicensingPayments Dive – February 22, 2024  Acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael Hsu called Wednesday for federal money transmitter licensing standards to replace the state licensing system that currently covers payments companies. [read post]
C|C Payments Blog - https://constantinecannon.com/practice/antitrust-litigation-counseling/cc-payments-blog/
Early Edition: February 16, 2024
16 Feb 2024, 4:32 am by Beatrice Yahia
Michael E. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
News You Can Use Digest – February 16, 2024
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Chief Witness Against Gaetz Is Cooperating with House Ethics Investigation DNyuz – Robert Draper and Michael Schmidt (New York Times) | Published: 2/9/2024 A lawyer for the chief witness against U.S. [read post]
Lobby Comply Blog - https://stateandfed.com/lobbycomply/feed
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Addendum I: A Few Reflections on the Oral Argument
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
Anderson, to account for things that arose at oral argument last Thursday. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
“Trump Lawyer Reads the Constitution Like a Secret Code Requiring Decryption”
13 Feb 2024, 10:38 am by Howard Bashman
Anderson: The Court’s Seeming Failure to Understand Some Basic Starting Points. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
Trump Lawyer Reads the Constitution Like a Secret Code Requiring Decryption
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Anderson, a majority of the Justices appeared likely to reverse the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling that Donald Trump is ineligible to run in the state’s Republican Party Presidential primary because he “engaged in insurrection or rebellion,” thus disqualifying him under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
La Niña on the horizon? California’s wild weather year could get even weirder
12 Feb 2024, 8:02 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
However, the Sierra snowpack remains only about halfway to its April 1 peak, “so if we see a longer stretch of dry conditions it is still possible to end the season with a below-average snowpack,” said Michael Anderson, state climatologist with the DWR. [read post]
J&Y Personal Injury Blog - https://jnylaw.com/blog/
Monday’s LobbyComply News Roundup
12 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
” by Natalie Anderson (Virginian-Pilot) for MSN The post Monday’s LobbyComply News Roundup appeared first on State and Federal Communications. [read post]
Lobby Comply Blog - https://stateandfed.com/lobbycomply/feed
[Steven Calabresi] Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
Anderson appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A packed courtroom for the Trump ballot case
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Seated separately in the bar section is Michael Dreeben, an SG’s office veteran who is working for Special Counsel Jack Smith on the criminal prosecution of Trump over Jan. 6. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] All Blackman-Tillman Articles, Presentations, Amicus Briefs, Commentary, and Blog posts on Section 3 and Insurrection
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Protect Good Faith Security Research Globally in Proposed UN Cybercrime Treaty
7 Feb 2024, 7:57 am by Karen Gullo
This lack of clarity could ultimately weaken everyone's online safety and security. [read post]
Deeplinks Blog - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks
:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
Today we take up some problems with Lash's use of constitutional legislative history, even where accurately recounted, in the course of legal analysis of the Constitution's text. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
Anderson asserts (pp. 38-40) that Section Three can only be enforced following a criminal conviction under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  There’s nothing further in the brief arguing that Section 3’s disqualification doesn’t extend to the presidency. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/