Search for: "Michaels v. Post"
Results 21 - 40
of 9,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2022, 11:48 am
The post MICHAEL MAURICE ALLEN, SR. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 12:50 pm
Read the opinion The post ANTHONY MICHAEL WESTERMAN v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 5:53 am
Read the opinion The post MICHAEL MARKS v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:51 pm
The post MICHAEL DONALDSON, JR. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:17 am
The court sentenced Appellant to an aggregate term of eighteen months’ incarceration, suspended all but time served, and imposed an eighteen-month period of […] The post JEFFREY MICHAEL SCHATZ v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 8:21 am
He was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment, all but three years suspended, and five years of supervised […] The post MICHAEL DANIEL BULL v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:42 am
The post MICHAEL SHRADER v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:09 pm
The post MICHAEL C. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:04 am
Read the opinion The post MICHAEL C. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
The post MICHAEL C. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:26 am
The post MICHAEL C. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:10 am
Professor Michael Kagan (UNLV) offers his analysis:... [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 9:47 am
Michael Kagan Cross-posted from Notice & Comment, A blog from the Yale Journal of Regulation Last week the Obama Administration filed its opening brief in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:29 am
Read the opinion The post MICHAEL G. [read post]
2 May 2022, 6:11 am
The post MICHAEL ANTHONY HUTH v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:21 am
Michael P. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 1:08 pm
Michael Kagan provides the latest installment in ImmigrationProf Blog's On-Line symposium on Texas v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 6:03 am
Read the opinion The post MICHAEL J. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
