Search for: "Michal v. Michal"
Results 21 - 40
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court Industrial Union Dep’t v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”) Schwab v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:19 am
In addition to myself, fourteen other professors who have benefited from this unique experience include Oren Bar-Gill, Michal Barzuza, Howard Chang, Allen Ferrell, Jesse Fried, Andrew Guzman, Assaf Hamdani, Scott Hirst, Robert Jackson, Christine Jolls, Marcel Kahan, Holger Spamann, Charles Wang, and David Walker. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 11:01 am
Michal SkrejpekCommercium inter gentes Josef StašaCel? [read post]
28 Aug 2021, 3:44 am
I am predicting right now that after the Supreme Court overturns (or guts) Roe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:31 am
Circuit Judge James Dennis wrote a strongly worded dissenting opinion arguing that the majority does violence to the text of the Lanham Act by expanding the statute into noncommercial political speech protected by the First Amendment (Alliance for Good Government v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 11:48 am
Pulte v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Thus, the judgment on the trademark infringement and false advertising claims were reversed and the case remanded (Select Comfort Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:08 am
It remanded back to the district court to consider the infringement claim under the proper standard (Underwood v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm
On 7 July 2021 judgment was handed down in the case of Vardy v Rooney [2021] EWHC 1888 (QB). [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
On 24 June 2021 the Court of Appeal (Popplewell, Dingemans and Carr LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:26 am
Ltd v Google India Pvt. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:26 am
Ltd v Google India Pvt. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm
Content Providers’ Secondary Liability: A Social Network Perspective, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2016, Michal Lavi, Hebrew University of Jerusalem – Faculty of Law. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
§ 1071, while ambiguous, favored the interpretation that a party dissatisfied with an initial TTAB decision, or any subsequent TTAB decision, retains the right to choose whether to appeal the decision to the Federal Circuit or to a district court (Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:33 am
The appellate court affirmed, however, the grant of summary judgment with respect to publications occurring prior to March 2015 (Martin v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:33 am
The appellate court affirmed, however, the grant of summary judgment with respect to publications occurring prior to March 2015 (Martin v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P, Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack,&nb [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:14 am
Writing separately, Circuit Judge Rawlinson said she would have affirmed the district court’s decision (OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
