Search for: "Michigan v. Miller" Results 21 - 40 of 388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Miller, 2012 WL 5300721, at *6. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 8:14 am by Jeanne Long
In the latter, Miller v Citizens Insurance Co, No 141747, the Court had previously granted leave to appeal the attorney-fee dispute under the No-Fault Act. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 11:37 am by Nicole Mazzocco
On remand from the Michigan Supreme Court, in Miller-Davis Co v Ahrens Construction, Inc., No. 284037, the Court of Appeals was asked to consider whether the plaintiff’s breach-of-contract claim was barred by the six-year statute of limitations in MCL 600.5807. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:48 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Tinker v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:14 am by Steven M. Gursten
Miller letter to medical provider of No-Fault insurance benefits Personal injury attorneys in attendance are invited to access the full documentation from the seminar by becoming a fan of Michigan Auto Law on Facebook. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:49 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Juvenile lifer Ray CarpA few years ago, we tracked the Miller v Alabama case as it went to the SCOTUS to decide whether juveniles could be given life sentences. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
  For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:08 pm
School Board's attempt to discipline teachers for protesting the closing of schools held to violate the teachers' First Amendment rightsConn and Miller v Board of Education, City of Detroit, Federal District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, Docket No. 2:08-cv-13073, Justice Stephen J. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:18 am by Kayla Campbell
Apr. 29, 2020) (applying exceptions to the exhaustion requirement given the risk of severe health consequences if delays in relief should occur); Miller v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 9:15 am by Matthew Nelson
The Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Tus v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:45 pm by Patricia Salkin
Defendants, David Miller and Donald Miller, were qualified medical marijuana patients along with defendant, Katherine Null, who served as David’s registered medical marijuana primary caregiver. [read post]