Search for: "Mike McGinnis" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Skull and crossbones to follow: San Francisco pols decree health warnings on soft drink, Frappuccino billboards [Steve Chapman] Judge criticizes feds’ punitive handling of AIG rescue as unlawful, but says no damages are owed to Hank Greenberg [Bloomberg, Thaya Knight/Cato, Gideon Kanner who predicted outcome, W$J] Congress resisting Obama/HUD scheme to force communities to build low-income housing [Jonathan Nelson/Economics21, Marc Thiessen] California, following New York, proposes 50… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:39 am by F. Tim Knight
Mike Rhodin (Senior VP, IBM Watson) was one of the respondents on this panel. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold is Version 3.1 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm by JB
In fact, Mike, John and I all employ values to choose our particular versions of originalism. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 5:04 am
” For readers who want more on this topic, I’d recommend Mike’s paper (with John McGinnis): The Abstract Meaning Fallacy. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 3:10 pm
I am now beginning to read John McGinnis and Mike Rappaport’s book Originalism and the Good Constitution for my Georgetown seminar, “Recent Books on the Constitution. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 11:43 am by Randy Barnett
 You will note that Mike published his originalist critique of current practice during the mid-point of the Bush administration. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 6:09 pm by Will Baude
Similarly, Mike Rappaport and John McGinnis defended “the Senate’s long practice of requiring a supermajority to end debate on legislation,” on the grounds that: If the Senate voted on whether to change the cloture rule, only a simple majority would be needed to change it. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Nussbaum (1) Bernard-Henry Lévy (3) Bert Parks (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bessie Smith (1) Best of the Web (7) bestiality (14) Beta Rube (1) betamax3000 (18) Beth (the commenter) (9) Bette Davis (14) Bette Midler (1) Betty Friedan (8) Betty White (1) Beyonce (18) Bhutan (2) Bianca Jagger (1) Bible (40) Biddy Martin (13) biden (177) Biden gaffes (21) Biff (1) big and small (5) Big Government sounds like a creepy stalker (10) Big Hollywood (1) Big Mike (1) bigotry (22) biking (160)… [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:25 am by Walter Olson
” More: Mike Rappaport (noting that the right too has been influenced by legal academia’s “preference for broad overarching theories,” as on originalism), Peter Suderman. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:29 am by Alfred Brophy
 “McGinnis and Rappaport are not always very clear about what  these original interpretive methods are. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:18 am by Walter Olson
-speech case (2) WSJ: John McGinnis reviews Schools for Misrule (2) [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:20 pm by Walter Olson
Levine (20) WSJ: John McGinnis reviews Schools for Misrule (2) Who was the first legal blogger? [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am by Aaron Tang
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:11 am by Mike Rappaport
Restricting myself to those who have served in the academy, these scholars include (and I am surely missing some important people) Steve Calabresi, Brad Clark, John Harrison, Doug Kmiec, Gary Lawson, Nelson Lund, John Manning, Michael McConnell, John McGinnis, Mike Paulsen, and myself. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:08 pm by Rick
Mike was with the Alternate Defense Office (ADO) at the time. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 10:02 pm by Walter Olson
Tags: Schools for Misrule Related posts WSJ: John McGinnis reviews Schools for Misrule (1) Supplying a missing footnote (0) Speaking tour on Schools for Misrule (3) Sent off (1) Scott Greenfield on Schools for Misrule (2) [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:10 am by Mike Rappaport
In my own work with John McGinnis, we have attempted to address these criticisms. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:59 am by Lawrence Solum
The latest post from Mike Rappaport responds to Randy Barnett (here and here) responding to an earlier post by Mike. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Randy Barnett
This is implied by Mike labeling others “constructionists” while excluding himself–as though he and McGinnis are not advocating their own approach to construction that requires normative justification. [read post]