Search for: "Miller v. Employment Division" Results 21 - 40 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2008, 12:02 pm
Employee's claim that her employee organization breached its duty of fair representation rejected as untimely Nabors v Town of Somers, 2008 NY Slip Op 06972, decided on September 16, 2008, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentElizabeth Miller Nabors sued both. her former employer, the Town of Somers, alleging that she had been wrongfully terminated and her negotiating unit representative, CSEA Local 1000, claiming that CSEA had breached its duty of fair… [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 6:36 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Kavanaugh filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part (Midwest Division – MMC, LLC dba Menorah Medical Center v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rhoads 5th Senate District :Would provided for retroactive Tier V membership in the NY State and Local Employees' Retirement System to Daniel Miller S6343 by Andrew Gounardes 26th Senate District : Relates to the limitation of overtime compensation in final average salary calculations S6477 by Robert Jackson 31st Senate District : Provides home addresses of certain employees to employee organizations S6482A by John W. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rhoads 5th Senate District :Would provided for retroactive Tier V membership in the NY State and Local Employees' Retirement System to Daniel Miller S6343 by Andrew Gounardes 26th Senate District : Relates to the limitation of overtime compensation in final average salary calculations S6477 by Robert Jackson 31st Senate District : Provides home addresses of certain employees to employee organizations S6482A by John W. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"***The Appellate Division characterized the Applicant's notice of claim  as constituting "at best a plea for reconsideration" which effort "neither tolled the Statute of Limitations nor began anew the time within which review could be sought," citing Miller v McGough, 97 AD2d 416. [read post]