Search for: "Miller v. Rollings"
Results 21 - 40
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P, Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack,&nb [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm
Internet and Social Media The Guardian had a piece “UK ministers urged to make tech giants responsible for scams” Twitter will roll out a new prompt to users who are about to send a tweet that its algorithms believe could be “harmful or offensive”. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 9:23 am
Louisiana (2016) and Miller v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
Cooley and Nobles v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Alt-Right, Greenblatt v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
Internet and Social Media YouTube users will be able to opt out of most gambling and alcohol adverts if they don’t want to see them, using tools set to be rolled out by Google in the UK next year. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:47 am
Surescripts and U.S. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:00 am
In its 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
Under Roe, state laws banning or restrictively regulating abortion were invalid.After two decades of backlash and maneuvering by the anti-abortion movement (including violence against clinics and providers), the Court revisited Roe in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Zen Magnets v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 11:10 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the judges in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union therefore erred when concluding that the triggering of Article 50 “is a bullet that cannot be withdrawn. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:29 am
The Reporters cite Badie v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
No, the case isn’t actually titled Conway v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Just one criminal law case among the relist rolls this week: Kahler v. [read post]
