Search for: "Million v. Board of Education" Results 21 - 40 of 1,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 10:03 am by gstasiewicz
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has received documents from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) concerning the NLRB’s decision to file a lawsuit against Seattle-based Boeing for opening a $750 million non-union assembly plant in North Charleston, South Carolina, to manufacture its Dreamliner plane (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 10:38 am by Craig Livermore
 For example, the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 20 Abbott v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:17 am by Howard Knopf
Katz’s submission – notably objecting to allowing its list of affiliates to become public, even though it is asking for tens of millions of dollars per year on their behalf. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Since his appointment as the Board’s Chair four years ago, which was seen as very promising by myself and others, there has been very limited opportunity to hear or read about his views on Board reform. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 9:28 am by Stephen Lubben
In two prior posts earlier this month, I examined the Chicago Board of Education's adversary complaint against Lehman, in which the Board struggles mightily to avoid termination of an interest-rate swap under the procedures set forth in the ISDA Master Agreement, as doing so would result in the Board paying Lehman more than $1 million. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:24 am
*In Barkan's lawsuit against the school district, the principal issue concerned whether a board of education that has essentially adopted the provisions of Public Officers Law §18** is obligated to provide a defense and indemnification to board members and employees against whom the school district, on behalf of the board of education, has commenced a civil action. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 11:04 am
The price of knowledge just went up a lot today in Canada.Access Copyright ("AC") was opposed by the provincial Ministers of Education (other than Quebec) and each of the Ontario School Boards ("the Educators"). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
” Accordingly, said the Appellate Division, “that part of the arbitration award is irrational because ‘there is no proof whatever to justify [it].'”* (see generally Matter of Buffalo Teachers Fedn., Inc. v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Buffalo, 50 AD3d 1503, lv denied 11 NY3d 708).The Council decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_05898.htm [read post]
10 May 2018, 12:27 pm
A former member of the Board of Education (Board) testified, “Ms. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am by Howard Knopf
But the result is obviously what it is – which is a serious problem for the Board and for Canadian copyright policy, not to mention for Access Copyright and the Canadian educational community. [read post]