Search for: "Minnesota Voters Alliance"
Results 21 - 40
of 133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2020, 8:28 am
.'" Judge Tigar went on to say that the regulation was also not a "reasonable" restriction because "it fails to provide an 'objective, workable standard[]' and so is not 'capable of reasoned application'": In Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
Several cases also dealt with First Amendment issues surrounding elections in the vein of Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
The processes are designed to protect against voter fraud in mail voting, as there is no poll worker to perform an in-person verification of the voter’s identity. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 6:10 pm
Maine: In Alliance of Retired Americans v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 10:39 am
It's possible that the school might avoid this objection by delineating much more precisely just what counts; but I doubt that it will be any more successful in this than the Minnesota election authorities in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 10:39 am
It's possible that the school might avoid this objection by delineating much more precisely just what counts; but I doubt that it will be any more successful in this than the Minnesota election authorities in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:46 am
For example, 13 states (Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Carolina and South Dakota) require authorization—often by voter signature—to collect and drop off ballots on behalf of the voter. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 3:15 pm
Yesterday's Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 3:12 pm
From yesterday's Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 3:10 pm
In yesterday's Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:59 pm
Texas In Texas Alliance for Retired Americans v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:03 pm
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Excluding Transit Ads That "Contain Political Messages" Violates the First Amendment
14 Sep 2020, 12:21 pm
" And, as in Minnesota Voters Alliance, today's Third Circuit decision in Center for Investigative Reporting v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:19 pm
This time, members of the Minnesota Voters Alliance say Gov. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 10:26 am
The court found that the rule’s blanket ban on “political” content fails the Supreme Court’s “objective, workable standards” test, as articulated in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
Instead of staring down “the unholy alliance of lobbyists and donors and special interests” as Trump recently declared, the influence industry has flourished during his administration. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
[Just testified this morning before the House Ways & Means Committee Oversight Subcommittee about this.] [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
Primary challenges to incumbents are rarely successful, and Trump’s poll numbers among Republican voters have proved resilient. [read post]
22 May 2019, 7:59 am
" Here is the abstract: On its face, Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 6:53 am
I thanked Platforma Obywatelska in my speech at yesterday's Munich demonstration (the largest one of roughly 100), which starts at 2h42m of the recorded livestream.Even if an unholy alliance between Merkel's party and numerous Southern European parties secured a majority on Tuesday, the proposed directive would still have to be formally adopted by the EU Council. [read post]
