Search for: "Mintz v. Mintz"
Results 21 - 40
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 4:26 pm
But from the LexBlog team we’ve got a piece on inspiring personality in your blog, and an LXBN Leaders profile of the Mintz Levin ... [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 9:22 am
[Robert Mintz, HCPLive] Tags: medical, medical malpractice, technology Related posts Medical tourism (12) Med-mal in the Upper Midwest (6) Med mal: around the blogs (0) Harris v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 3:26 am
I’ve named it after Quick Draw McGraw, one of my favorite, classic Saturday morning TV cartoons, and because it so nicely describes the unusual buy-sell mechanism enforced by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice David Schmidt in his fascinating decision earlier this month in Mintz v Pazer, Decision and Order, Index No. 502127/13 [Sup Ct, Kings County Mar. 12, 2014]. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:25 pm
In Sitar v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 9:22 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
Regular readers of this blog may remember the Quick Draw (as I dubbed it) buy-sell agreement in the Mintz v Pazer case decided by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice David Schmidt. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 10:42 am
"Apple v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
By Marcus Mintz In a recent case filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Mainline Information Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:53 am
First noted by Bill Freivogel, and recently analyzed by Mike Mintz at Martindale.com, Zalewski v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:09 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denying the petition for initial hearing en banc in Golinski v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:08 pm
See Paramount Termite Control Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 5:30 pm
Court Dismisses CFAA, ECPA, and Other Claims in Privacy Class Action Opperman v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:33 am
The plaintiff in the case, DiCampli-Mintz v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 5:18 am
” This distinction is at issue in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 9:15 am
The Federal Circuit has repeatedly confirmed that secondary consideration evidence is an integral part of an obviousness analysis (indeed, it “may be the most pertinent, probative, and revealing evidence available to the decision maker in reaching a conclusion on the obviousness/nonobviousness issue”) and thus has mandated consideration of such evidence in assessing obviousness (Mintz v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:03 pm
Howard Mintz has this story in the San Jose Mercury-News. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:26 am
On May 4, the Israeli Supreme Court, sitting as a High Court of Justice (HCJ), issued its long-awaited judgment in Abu Aram v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 12:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit provides free access to the Brief for Appellant in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
District Judge Stephen V. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 10:34 am
See Lenel Systems Int’l., Inc. v. [read post]
