Search for: "Mission Imports, Inc. v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), failed to answer this question. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am
In fairness to the Board, part of this delay was due to the detour through the Federal Court of Appeal on the issue of crown immunity. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm
Although American-style shareholder primacy was firmly rejected by the Supreme Court of Canada in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, shareholders can certainly be one of the stakeholder interests considered. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:18 am
Earlier in the week, I was able to trace nearly one third of Richard v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:50 am
To that end, the FTC released an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) on earnings claims as it embarked on a mission to adopt a rule that would give the FTC, in its own words, “an important new tool to return money to consumers injured by deceptive income claims, and to hold bad actors accountable with civil penalties. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
The same reluctance that infected federal courts appears to have affected antitrust appropriations by Congress too. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
When the Commission adopted the policy in 1972, it included a brief statement explaining why it needed the policy: “it is important to avoid creating, or permitting to be created, an impression that a decree is being entered or a sanction imposed, when the conduct alleged did not, in fact, occur. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
Box 99 Lennon MI 48449 Phone: (810) 621-3646 E-mail: chadd-genesee@juno.com Web: http://community.mlive.com/cc/chadd-geneseecounty Lake Superior Branch Gwinn, MI Phone: (906) 227-2733 Ann Arbor Jim Reisinger Adults with A.D.D. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
— Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, November 30, 2009 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent decree to address a lawsuit filed by Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Mike Nagata, senior vice president of CACI International Inc.; retired Lt. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
(E.g., Joshua Tree Downtown Business Alliance v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym of the Federal District Court for the District of Central California. [read post]
