Search for: "Mitchel v. Brown" Results 21 - 40 of 207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Case Summaries – N.C. Court of Appeals (Nov. 1, 2022)
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am by Alex Phipps
State v. [read post]
North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/
A guide to the amicus briefs in the affirmative-action cases
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm by Ellena Erskine, Angie Gou, and Elisabeth Snyder
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Case Summaries – N.C. Court of Appeals (Sept. 6, 2022)
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am by Alex Phipps
State v. [read post]
North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/
News You Can Use Digest – August 26, 2022
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
Lobby Comply Blog - https://stateandfed.com/lobbycomply/feed
[Josh Blackman] Kelley v. Becerra, the Preventive Care Mandate and the Major Questions Doctrine
27 Jul 2022, 9:47 am by Josh Blackman
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 160 (2000). [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The Post-Roe World: A Reality Check on the Implications of the Leaked Supreme Court Opinion
16 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell and former Clinton Attorney General Eric Holder had a preposterous discussion of how if Roe goes down, Brown v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
News You Can Use Digest – January 28, 2022
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Palin v. [read post]
Lobby Comply Blog - https://stateandfed.com/lobbycomply/feed
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Gordon College v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Blockbuster watch: Affirmative action, same-sex weddings, and other big relists
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
Nance v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] Is the Sixth Circuit Choosing Reversal over Duty?
26 Aug 2021, 4:16 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Jackson, 542 U.S. 649, 652–53 (2004); Mitchell v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Indian Law Bulletins Update 8/25
25 Aug 2021, 2:57 pm by Unknown
Brown (McGirt v. [read post]
National Indian Law Library -- News - http://nilllibrary.blogspot.com/
Montana Indian Law Section CLE (April 23 and May 7, 021)
10 Apr 2021, 8:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Lezmond Mitchell. [read post]
Turtle Talk - http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/
2021 FBA [Virtual] Indian Law Conference — April 8-9, 2021
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Cooley and Nobles v. [read post]
Turtle Talk - http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/
Weekly Roundup: March 12–18, 2021
19 Mar 2021, 6:08 am
Robert Brown, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, on Friday, March 12, 2021 Tags: Accountability, Accounting, Accounting standards, Audits, Bebchuk v. [read post]
The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog - http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov
[Eugene Volokh] Kentucky Bill Would Ban "Fighting Words" Aimed at Police Officers
13 Mar 2021, 10:27 am by Eugene Volokh
But in Wisconsin v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Can a Fighting Words Charge Lead to a Higher Sentence Because of the Defendant's Racial Motivation?
4 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But in R.A.V. v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
"Zombie statutes," non-universality, and judicial departmentalism
25 Oct 2020, 8:56 am by Howard Wasserman
Chin et al., Still on the Books: Jim Crow and Segregation Laws Fifty Years After Brown v. [read post]
PrawfsBlawg - http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/
[Josh Blackman] Judge Costa (CA5): "It is often said that courts 'strike down' laws when ruling them unconstitutional. That's not quite right. Courts hold laws unenforceable; they do not erase them."
23 Oct 2020, 8:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Chin et al., Still on the Books: Jim Crow and Segregation Laws Fifty Years After Brown v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Judge Costa (CA5): "It is often said that courts 'strike down' laws when ruling them unconstitutional. That's not quite right. Courts hold laws unenforceable; they do not erase them."
23 Oct 2020, 8:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Chin et al., Still on the Books: Jim Crow and Segregation Laws Fifty Years After Brown v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
¿Qué contexto llevó a que Ruth Bader Ginsburg fuese considerada al Supremo Federal?
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
Microjuris al Día - http://aldia.microjuris.com/