Search for: "Mitchell v. Branch" Results 21 - 40 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2021, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The elements of a cause of action sounding in fraud are a material misrepresentation of an existing fact, made with knowledge of the falsity, an intent to induce reliance thereon, justifiable reliance upon the misrepresentation, and damages” (Mitchell v Diji, 134 AD3d 779, 780 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred without prejudice to renewal after completion of discovery. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The statute of limitations for civil RICO claims is four years” and “is deemed to have accrued when the plaintiff knew or should have known of his or her injury, regardless of when he or she discovered the underlying fraud'” (House of Spices [India], Inc. v SMJ Servs., Inc., 103 AD3d 848, 849-850, quoting Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d 169, 178; see Mitchell v Diji, 134 AD3d 779, 781). [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
Philip Randolph, James Farmer, Clarence Mitchell, James Forman, Amzie Moore, Aaron Henry, James Bevel, James Lawson, Andrew Young, Franklin McCain, Medgar Evers, James Meredith, Vernon Dahmer, and the thousands of others whose lives and deaths forced legislators and the executive branch to confront the monstrous evil of white supremacy. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
Philip Randolph, James Farmer, Clarence Mitchell, James Forman, Amzie Moore, Aaron Henry, James Bevel, James Lawson, Andrew Young, Franklin McCain, Medgar Evers, James Meredith, Vernon Dahmer, and the thousands of others whose lives and deaths forced legislators and the executive branch to confront the monstrous evil of white supremacy. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am by Rohini Kurup
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress his statements to law enforcement authorities and physical evidence. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 11:39 am by Samuel Bray
Jonathan Mitchell, The Writ–of–Erasure Fallacy, 104 Va. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm by Sara Bodnar
Supreme Court decision known as Chevron v. [read post]