Search for: "Mitchell v. Holder" Results 21 - 40 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Of course, across the “v” sits Microsoft as another very large patent holder. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
United States, 09-10231, and Mitchell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:15 am
Finley, which challenged political content restriction on NEA funding; and Holder v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
No, the patent exhaustion doctrine, commonly referred to as the first sale doctrine, is triggered by an unconditional sale and was set way back in Mitchell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 7:03 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
State, 975 So. 2d 593, 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (quoting Mitchell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am by ASAD KHAN
In particular Parliament has deliberately applied the subsection to consideration only of an applicant’s private life, rather than also of his family life which has been the predominant focus in the ECtHR of the consideration identified in the Mitchell case. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:11 am
"The Appeals Court ruling was based on an e-mail exchange between Basis and Amazon during mid-trial at the lower court (Basis Technology Corp. v. [read post]