Search for: "Mitchell v. Rogers" Results 21 - 40 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Rogers (2011) – Kelly TerryPublic Housing as Housing of Last Resort: Department of Housing and Urban Development v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; Roger L. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 10:27 am
Now comes the defamation lawsuit that Roger Clemens filed against Brian McNamee, his former trainer, over McNamee's statements to law enforcement and the Mitchell Commission that Clemens used performance-enhancing drugs. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 3:51 am
District Court for the Southern District of Texas has sent 46-year-old former pitching ace Roger Clemens to the showers, throwing out the remainder of the seven-time Cy Young award-winner's defamation lawsuit against former trainer Brian McNamee (William Roger Clemens v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:57 am by Walter Olson
“Electronic Arts Has Right to Refer to John Dillinger in Its Video Games” [Volokh] Fans of “Civil Gideon” (constitutional entitlement to publicly funded lawyers in civil cases) glum that SCOTUS didn’t give idea much of a boost in Turner v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:15 am
Mitchell Professor in Law and Public Policy at Georgetown University Law Center, where he teaches constitutional law, national security, and criminal justice.Cole has litigated many constitutional cases in the Supreme Court, including Texas v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
At Business Law Prof Blog, Lawrence Mitchell discusses the March oral argument in Halliburton v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 8:00 pm
Some stories that have recently caught our collective eye: Costs in a Hague ApplicationA recent blog by Toronto family lawyer Andrew Feldstein discusses the case Mitchell v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Such a claim was successful in People v Mitchell (2010 NY Slip Op 06926 [4th Dept 10/01/10]) in which the Court held thatThe evidence at trial established only that defendant constructively possessed the firearms with respect to the criminal possession of a weapon counts of which he was convicted, and thus the People proved only a single actus reus (see People v Laureano, 87 NY2d 640, 643; People v Hunt, 52 AD3d 1312, lv denied 11 NY3d 737; People v… [read post]