Search for: "Mitchell v. State of Tennessee" Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2007, 1:48 pm
The Valentines, jointly and severally, make a number of arguments based on United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 2:21 pm by David Kopel
The professors are: VC's Randy Barnett (Georgetown), Royce Barondes (Missouri), Robert Cottrol (George Washington), Nicholas Johnson (Fordham), Nelson Lund (George Mason), Joyce Malcolm (George Mason), George Mocsary (Southern Illinois), Joseph Olson (Mitchell Hamline), Glenn Reynolds (Tennessee), and Gregory Wallace (Campbell). [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Betty Mitchell ("Mitchell" or "the state") now appeals the district court's issuance of the writ. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
Davis    Eastern District of Tennessee at Greeneville 08a0691n.06 USA v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 8:39 am by Andrew Frisch
This Court has identified several activities that satisfy this test—see, e.g., id., at 249, 251, 76 S.Ct. 330; Mitchell v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Oaktree Cap Mgmt    Middle District of Tennessee at NashvilleMcKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Mitchell    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0301p.06 2008/08/18 Info-Hold Incorporated v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
The United States appeals Joseph Hairston's 60- month sentence, which was re-imposed by the district court on remand in light of United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am by JB
Later cases like Hibbs and Tennessee v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
Mitchell    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0605n.06 USA v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Defendant also argues that his 360-month sentence of incarceration is unreasonable in light of United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association (2001) -- state actionStenberg v. [read post]