Search for: "Moffat v. Moffat"
Results 21 - 40
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 12:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
The balance between privacy and transparency in regard to disclosing MPs’ expenses was comprehensively settled by the High Court in 2008, following a trilogy of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) appeals in the then Information Tribunal: Leapman [pdf], Baker [pdf] and Moffat [pdf]. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:51 pm
In today’s case (Gendron v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 7:22 am
This may require independent legal advice: Moffat v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm
Moffat in effect submitted, the Appellants betrayed ample familiarity with English in their various dealings with the court system. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm
Moffat in effect submitted, the Appellants betrayed ample familiarity with English in their various dealings with the court system. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
SEC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
CA) and Monsanto v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
R. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Jed and Maggie, during brief periods of personal détente, actually quiz each other about the underlying facts of old cases, including Weems v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
The more serious analysis from John Bolch : A few more thoughts on litigants in person “As litigants in person seems to be the subject of the moment, I thought I would return briefly to S v AG, the case I reported yesterday, to point out a couple of things mentioned by Mr Justice Mostyn, typical of cases where parties are not professionally represented. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm
Moffat, Conceptual Separability and the Copyright/Patent Boundary Ribbon rack: most famous hard case on conceptual separability, where there is no physical separability (as when you have a sculptured Mickey Mouse holding a working phone). [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Grubb v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:12 am
Panel 4 Viva Moffat observed that secondary liability issues generate the most heat in online harassment discussions. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am
Case: Parker v. [read post]
