Search for: "Moore v. City of Columbia" Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
Moore (lawfulness of search following arrest that violates state law)06-1181 -- Dada v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by Terry Hart
” Cravath Partners Spearhead New Copyright Program at Columbia Law — A great profile of a new pro bono clinic for copyright plaintiffs in New York City, led by Cravath, Swain & Moore partners David Marriott and David Kappos. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit erred in holding that a general principle of law announced in Moore v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
City and County of San Francisco 14-704Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia's invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia’s decision in Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Association Inc. and Military-Veterans Advocacy Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the December 7, January 4 and January 11 conferences)   Moore v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-7496, and Moore v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Moore Issue: Did the Sixth Circuit properly interpret Faretta v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:08 pm by Michael Geist
D is for Digital Canada 150, the long awaited digital strategy released in April by Industry Minister James Moore. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:39 pm by Michael Geist
D is for Digital Canada 150, the long awaited digital strategy released in April by Industry Minister James Moore. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  The press release is here and there is a post about the report on Martin Moore’s blog. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]