Search for: "Moore v. King et al"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Think Tank) IEEE patent scorecard for 2008 is out (Innovationpartners) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent databases: 2008 in review (Patent Librarian's Notebook) New kind codes for republished PCT documents (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) The model changes at PatentFreedom; Matsushita is top troll target (IAM) Patent litigation, the ITC, and hardship in the chip industry (IP finance) Global - Copyright Public domain day 2009 (Creative Commons), (Michael Geist)… [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
The emphasis is therefore on its being a distraction, something that gives pleasure (see ‘Sports Law' by Gardiner et al (Cavendish, 1998). [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
Cover’s insights suggests both the power and permanence of these nomic contests within an international law that has at once lost its moorings in public law but is building new foundations of authority and action interlinked with but distinct from public law. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
IPSO IPSO has issued a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 03743-18 Purcell v metro.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03195-18 Purcell v Hackney Gazette, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03194-18 Purcell v The Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 03180-18 Purcell v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation Resolution… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
Dennis Moore; Nick A. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
Pix Credit: The Apotheosis of George Washington; US Capitol Building Washington DCThe 4th day of July has been set aside in our Republic for the celebration of the signing of the Declaration of Independence by the members of the Second Continental Congress at that moment in rebellion against the authority of the King in Parliament of Great Britain and Ireland, whose subjects they then were. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Easton Enterprises et al (CAFC 2010-1057, -1116) precedential Tokai didn't get evidence in because of procedural error: failure to submit written reports for its experts, Jones and Sung. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Chair, Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
