Search for: "Mortgage Charges Usury"
Results 21 - 40
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm
TOPCIS: federal-preemption, MIDLAND-FUNDING-LLC, National-Bank-Act, predatory-lending-issue, usury – posted 12/12/17Rich Reister vs. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
§§ 1692e, 1692f, and had charged a usurious rate of interest in violation of New York law, N.Y. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
§§ 1692e, 1692f, and had charged a usurious rate of interest in violation of New York law, N.Y. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 5:44 am
” In Madden, the Second Circuit ruled that a nonbank that purchases loans from a national bank could not charge the same rate of interest on the loan that Section 85 of the National Bank Act allows the national bank to charge. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Removal or impairment of the preferential treatment of national banks with respect to state-law usury liability would make lenders who must already abide by state-specific usury restrictions more competitive. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Removal or impairment of the preferential treatment of national banks with respect to state-law usury liability would make lenders who must already abide by state-specific usury restrictions more competitive. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:09 pm
Madden involved a class action on usury claims against a debt buyer that purchased a bunch of charged-off Bank of America, N.A., credit card debt. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
” PHH further argues that merely restarting the current proceeding still would not provide PHH with full relief because “the unconstitutional taint stemming from the initial authorization of the Notice of Charges would continue to infect this matter. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:30 am
In particular, consumers were likely to be connected to lenders that ignore state usury limits or claim immunity from state regulation and jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:30 am
In particular, consumers were likely to be connected to lenders that ignore state usury limits or claim immunity from state regulation and jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 1:36 pm
If the interest rate is higher than the statutory rate, it is called “usurious” and which is illegal. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 8:11 pm
It's done by finance companies or (prior to 2008) by mortgage banks. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:33 pm
A few months ago, the First Department appellate court invalidated a $1.13 million loan because it found its charges and interest to violate New York's criminal usury laws. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:10 pm
In addition, a QM loan generally cannot charge upfront points and fees in excess of 3% of the amount borrowed, such that much of the price of the mortgage can only be collected through interest, over time. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 8:27 am
Thereafter, interest shall accrue at the maximum legal rate permitted to be charged by non-exempt lenders under the usury laws of the State of California." [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 1:41 pm
The economic and psychological dynamics that affect pricing, on the other hand, are importantly different for small loans than mortgages. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 8:18 am
The rate is similar to usury caps that are already active in many states and in place for the military and their family members. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Moreover, Dodd-Frank bars the CFPB from directly setting usury limits. [read post]
26 May 2012, 12:19 pm
Some opponents of usury caps for servicemember loans argue that these will lead to tighter credit for servicemembers. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:22 pm
However, unlike previous attempts to invoke standing as an issue where securitized debt is concerned, state courts have long held with respect to usury that attempts to "launder" usury will not be tolerated, and state courts will look behind the form of a transaction that has been contrived to create a non-usurious appearance that deviates from a usurious economic substance. [read post]
