Search for: "Mosley v. Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2020, 1:21 pm
Mosley v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:28 pm
Policymakers in Europe and around the world are currently pursuing two reasonable-sounding goals for platform regulation. [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:29 am
Reed v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
That plea also supported the Claimant’s application that the hearing proceed in private, since there is an established principle that the court must adapt its procedures to ensure that it does not provide encouragement or assistance to blackmailers, and does not deter victims of blackmail from seeking justice from the courts (as is made clear in ZAM v CFM and TFW [2013] EWHC 662 (QB) at [39]-[41] and [44] and in LJY v Persons Unknown [2017] EWHC 3230 (QB) at… [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 6:56 am
In Mosley v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Nevertheless, notwithstanding the approach adopted by large search engines to date, name-based searches are only a “particular” (GC et. al. v CNIL at [46]) rather than the only example of processing which clearly satisfies the first threshold. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:59 am
App. 2015) (noting that the plaintiff chose not to take advantage of Rule 15.01 allowance of an amended pleading without leave of court); Mosley v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:23 am
In Mosley v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:26 pm
Princess Caroline of Monaco v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:55 pm
This would be decided on the circumstances of the case and it is not valid to suggest that public figures should expect less privacy as a justification for an intrusion on their private lives (Eady J in Mosley v NGN [2008] EWHC 1777).In the UK the Data Protection Act 2018 (the UK’s implementation of the GDPR) provides protection for the processing of personal data. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
Mosley the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am
First, does section 411(a) require only a completed application, or does it require that the application has been approved (or rejected)? [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 9:00 am
., encryption at rest for devices and media); (iii) not having compliant Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) in place; (iv) lack of transmission security; (v) lack of appropriate auditing; (vi) not patching software; (vii) insider threats; (viii) improper disposal; and (ix) insufficient backup and contingency planning. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:42 pm
This public interest derives, he says, from the conduct of the police in investigating these sorts of offences, and in the execution of search warrants, being a matter of public importance: There is always a public interest in knowing what the police does in the public’s name. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:50 am
See Barry Sookman, Internet justice: Mosley v Google. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
Access does, however, take issue with certain facts alleged by plaintiff, and asserts that:1. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:15 pm
Comment The DPA does not enable claimants to ‘muzzle the press’ as has been suggested. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 7:00 am
State v. [read post]
