Search for: "Mosley v. Doe" Results 21 - 40 of 222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 2:28 pm by Daphne Keller
Policymakers in Europe and around the world are currently pursuing two reasonable-sounding goals for platform regulation. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
That plea also supported the Claimant’s application that the hearing proceed in private, since there is an established principle that the court must adapt its procedures to ensure that it does not provide encouragement or assistance to blackmailers, and does not deter victims of blackmail from seeking justice from the courts (as is made clear in ZAM v CFM and TFW [2013] EWHC 662 (QB) at [39]-[41] and [44] and in LJY v Persons Unknown [2017] EWHC 3230 (QB) at… [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Nevertheless, notwithstanding the approach adopted by large search engines to date, name-based searches are only a “particular” (GC et. al. v CNIL at [46]) rather than the only example of processing which clearly satisfies the first threshold. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:59 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
App. 2015) (noting that the plaintiff chose not to take advantage of Rule 15.01 allowance of an amended pleading without leave of court); Mosley v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:55 pm
This would be decided on the circumstances of the case and it is not valid to suggest that public figures should expect less privacy as a justification for an intrusion on their private lives (Eady J in Mosley v NGN [2008] EWHC 1777).In the UK the Data Protection Act 2018 (the UK’s implementation of the GDPR) provides protection for the processing of personal data. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am by Eric Goldman
  First, does section 411(a) require only a completed application, or does it require that the application has been approved (or rejected)? [read post]
., encryption at rest for devices and media); (iii) not having compliant Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) in place; (iv) lack of transmission security; (v) lack of appropriate auditing; (vi) not patching software; (vii) insider threats; (viii) improper disposal; and (ix) insufficient backup and contingency planning. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
This public interest derives, he says, from the conduct of the police in investigating these sorts of offences, and in the execution of search warrants, being a matter of public importance: There is always a public interest in knowing what the police does in the public’s name. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Comment The DPA does not enable claimants to ‘muzzle the press’ as has been suggested. [read post]