Search for: "Most v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 4,936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2007, 12:35 pm
Continuing in the trend established by the landmark 2002 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Whiten v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 5:53 am by Jeff Welty
He appealed for trial de novo in superior court, and the following exchange took place: THE COURT: The State has a motion to amend. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
From a review of the Superior Court’s most recent annual report, from the 2017/2018 year, it is clear that the Superior Court had limited insight into its own operations. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 4:56 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
On August 31, 2016, the Connecticut Superior Court rejected this attempt and issued another ruling the Tribe’s favor and reaffirming its decision from November 2016 and granting the Tribe’s most recent challenge by issuing another strong decision in its favor. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:00 am by Brian Vertz
Strassburger, Jr., recently ascended to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:39 am by admin
January 3, 2019 In a recent case handed down by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, in Rebuck v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 1:43 pm by Shea Denning
Though most misdemeanor impaired driving charges arrive in superior court by virtue of an appeal for trial de novo, not all do. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:01 pm
Since we have just posted a Limerick commemorating the most celebrated of palimony cases, Marvin v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 1:43 pm
 For example, here, the Nevada County Superior Court has more than one authorized judge, but the Truckee branch of that court only has one assigned judge. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:34 am
Nearly every time the Appellate Division of the Superior Court decides to publish an opinion, it's one worth reading. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:28 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
(Gantman, J., dissenting).In its non-precedential opinion, the Superior Court quoted extensively from the case Mull v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Moreover, Chair Speigel acknowledged in her April 2020 article that our court system was drowning due to overly complicated rules, a scarcity of resources and most importantly, a lack of innovation and willingness to change[35]. [read post]