Search for: "Mountford"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 10:49 pm
Mountford discussed there, which is the authority for the rule that one of the features of a tenancy is ‘exclusive occupation’, is a prime example of how Judges make (or ‘clarify’) the law. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:28 am
Mountford, the landlord’s intention was to grant a residential licence but the Court decided otherwise). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:37 am
The locus classicus on this point is, of course, Street v Mountford where Lord Jauncey noted that the question is whether the agreement is “mere dressing up in an endeavour to clothe the agreement with a legal character which it would not otherwise have possessed. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:58 am
On these findings, and in the light of the decision in Street v Mountford, it is apparent that NHS PS had granted Global Guardians a tenancy of the Stamford Brook property. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 1:26 am
Mountford. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:29 am
By implication, this amounted to a monthly periodic tenancy in accordance with the decision in Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 11:25 am
They are derived from a licence given to the agency by the property owner.If we take this at face value, and put aside thoughts of Street v Mountford and Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406, then these may indeed be licences to occupy, rather than tenancies.But what of the two week notice period to terminate the occupier’s licence asserted by many of these Property Guardian firms (for example here, here, here and here)? [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:53 am
The decision made I had to get a job and took a lettings negotiator job at Mountfords in Surbiton, Surrey. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 11:25 am
They are derived from a licence given to the agency by the property owner.If we take this at face value, and put aside thoughts of Street v Mountford and Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406, then these may indeed be licences to occupy, rather than tenancies.But what of the two week notice period to terminate the occupier’s licence asserted by many of these Property Guardian firms (for example here, here, here and here)? [read post]
The appearance of a substantial defence in possession claims, and property guardians and possession.
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
As per Street v Mountford: “There can be no tenancy unless the occupier enjoys exclusive possession; but an occupier who enjoys exclusive possession is not necessarily a tenant. [read post]
2 Jun 2025, 1:20 pm
Following Stewart v Watts and Global 100 v Laleva, it was clear that Street v Mountford was to be under [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:00 am
By implication, this amounted to a monthly periodic tenancy in accordance with the decision in Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:27 am
Mountford ‘exclusive occupation’ is one of the hallmarks of a tenancy. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 8:51 am
In other words, if the VA were to actually settle an entire appeal at the CAVC – which is as rare as a 3 dollar nickel – or start including language in its JMR or JMPRs that the decision is not appealable (Author’s Note: as of April 11, 2018, the OGC has started to include waivers of appeal in their JMRs: click here to read the Joint Motion to Remand in Mountford v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:56 pm
Many local authorities use private accommodation for temporary accommodation under Housing Act 1996 Part VII. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
Austin v London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28 It has been a long story for Mr Austin and a long, long, long story for the tolerated trespasser. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
Austin v London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28 It has been a long story for Mr Austin and a long, long, long story for the tolerated trespasser. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 32What happens to a lease for an uncertain term? [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 32What happens to a lease for an uncertain term? [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:55 am
When I give presentations on lawyers’ ethical duty to be competent in technology, audience members often come up to me afterwards and ask something to the effect of, “Ok, I get it, but how do I become competent in technology? [read post]
