Search for: "Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2012, 8:54 am
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC's Appeal in the Citigroup Global Markets Appeal It is remarkable to think that it has been less than three months since the SEC announced its $285 million settlement with Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. under the usual neither-admit-nor-deny standard. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:54 am
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC's Appeal in the Citigroup Global Markets Appeal It is remarkable to think that it has been less than three months since the SEC announced its $285 million settlement with Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. under the usual neither-admit-nor-deny standard. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:50 am
See In re Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 258 S.W.3d at 626-27. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:07 am
“In the Citigroup Global Markets proceeding, Citigroup Global Markets moved for sanctions, including attorneys’ fees, against both defendant and his attorney, plaintiff, August 4, 2017. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 8:33 am
SEC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Ct. 1396 (2008) prevents the court's review of the arbitration award on nonstatutory grounds (”manifest disregard of the law” or contrary to public policy), the court cited Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 8:45 am
Second, just last week in Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WTO report confirms USTR lost on key issue of whether China’s thresholds for criminal IP enforcement are too high (Managing Intellectual Property) (IP Justice) (IP Justice) (China Hearsay) (China Law Blog) US: Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
, Global Global - General Candidates for post of WIPO Director General present their platforms: (WIPO), IP is not a thing: (Dilanchian), FOSS adoption and consumer welfare: (IPcentral) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Manufacturers becoming brand licensing companies: (IP ThinkTank), Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement moves forward: (Michael Geist) Global - Patents Office Open XML voted to become official… [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Google fails to obtain pan-EU trade mark protection for ‘Gmail’ due to confusingly similar German trade mark: (Class 46), (Ars Technica),UK High Court overturns UKIPO decision to refuse computer program patent application in Symbian’s Patent Application, UKIPO announces it will appeal (equivalent patent granted by… [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 11:03 am
JUNE 6, 2007: NASD FINED CITIGROUP $3 MILLION FOR FAILURE TO SUPERVISE On June 6, 2007, the NASD fined Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., $3 million for its failure to adequately supervise a team of brokers based in Charlotte, NC, who used misleading sales materials during dozens of seminars and meetings for hundreds of employees of BellSouth Corporation. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
, US CAFC throws out jury patent infringement verdict, raises potentially invalidating prior art: Finisar v DirecTV: (Patent Prospector), (Hal Wegner), (EDTexweblog.com), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IP Law360), (Patently-O), (Patently-O), Global Global - General Further resolution needed to keep IP issues in WTO negotiations: (Intellectual Property Watch), Mobile phone manufacturers seek to control rising IP costs: (Intellectual Property Watch), … [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 6:45 am
After oral argument in this case, other judges from this court addressed that question in another case - Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:37 pm
Smith Barney Div. of Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
., U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
He said that when you take over a department, as long as you don’t change anything, you’ll move up regardless of how your department performs. [read post]
