Search for: "Murphy v. Cole" Results 21 - 40 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2007, 12:10 pm
Yesterday, Molly Selvin, a popular staff writer for the Times, wrote a Q&A column about Monday's Murphy v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 10:17 am
Anthony Zaller, an attorney in CDF’s Los Angeles office, was recently quoted in Nation’s Restaurant News regarding potential effects the California Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 11:00 am
If you didn't get a chance to attend the Murphy v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 3:16 pm
Though it was already rendered moot by the Supreme Court's decision in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Richard Bagdasarian, Inc. 2008 WL 888524,  one of the penalty/wage cases that was a companion case to Murphy v Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 C4th 1094, and checked to see if it was still pending. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 2:19 pm
Yet another good reason to have live-client, robust civil clinics. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
So far, there is little express authority confirming that the holding in Murphy v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
Today's Daily Journal reports here (subscription) on Murphy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:09 pm
Tomorrow afternoon in San Francisco, the Supreme Court will be hearing oral arguments in Murphy v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 3:14 pm
Donna Ryu, a professor at Hastings College of the Law, is seeking $1.4 million in attorneys' fees for post-trial work in Murphy v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 12:11 pm
After thorough arguments from both sides of the debate, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 3:00 pm
One of the things we discussed at last week's wage & hour seminar in Costa Mesa was the long list of questions that remain unanswered after Murphy v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
One of the best published opinions regarding the executive exemption was Murphy v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 6:12 pm
I'm not going to do an in depth analysis of yesterday's Cal Supremes decision in Murphy v. [read post]