Search for: "Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions"
Results 21 - 40
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2007, 2:19 pm
Yet another good reason to have live-client, robust civil clinics. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:00 pm
In Tomlinson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094 makes such penalty wages available to a meal period pay claimant. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:09 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
Today's Daily Journal reports here (subscription) on Murphy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Richard Bagdasarian, Inc. 2008 WL 888524, one of the penalty/wage cases that was a companion case to Murphy v Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 C4th 1094, and checked to see if it was still pending. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 3:14 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., a wage-and-hour case she argued before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 12:11 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions today. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 2:12 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 3:00 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 3:16 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094, the Third District Court of Appeal has invalidated the Labor Commissioner's designation of Hartwig v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 4:49 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 728. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 6:12 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., S140308. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 4:15 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, which law professors, working with students, recently won at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
Kenneth Cole Productions [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:28 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., 40 Cal.4th 1094, 1102 (2007) (holding that Section 226.7 payment is “wage”). [read post]
7 May 2008, 6:00 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094, 1108], the instant court observes that Labor Code §203 does not provide that the employer is "subject to" the imposition of the waiting time penalty. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:00 am
Kenneth Cole Productions. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:27 am
(E.g., Murphy v. [read post]
