Search for: "Myers v. Department of Revenue"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
See Myers v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 6:47 pm
[1] Jacoby & Meyers, LLP v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:42 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:07 pm
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:40 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:02 pm
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am
” Based upon recent settlements with the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the government would likely contend that the Canadian company and English employee are covered as well. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Alabama Department of Revenue Docket: 09-520 Issue: Whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors, but not railroads, from a generally applicable sales and use tax is subject to challenge as “another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier” under Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Justice Department announced today. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
Conclusion Regardless of how charitable functions are defined by individual states, the conflicts between non-profit hospitals and revenue departments are likely to be convoluted and extensive. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (rychlicki.net), United States: Is the Justice Department really thinking about going after all of Google’s business on antitrust? [read post]
