Search for: "Myers v. Public Safety" Results 21 - 40 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Myth #3: Once negative results become public, any positive spin given by management will be viewed as misleading. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  In addition, a lawyer should further the public’s understanding of and confidence in the rule of law and the justice system because legal institutions in a constitutional democracy depend on popular participation and support to maintain their authority. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 1:16 pm by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
Myers released a decision on the issue of in person discoveries vs. virtual discoveries in WORSOFF v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm by Phil Dixon
Error to deny evidentiary hearing on IAC claim for failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence of brain damage; district court properly denied alleged Brady and Batson violations U.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 5:56 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Myers denied the motion for a stay of the July 6, 2020 order, applying the 3-part RJR Macdonald test. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 5:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Myers rule that employee speech is protected only if it is on "matters of public concern" and not motivated by the employee's personal employment grievance. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While inquiries into the Australian class actions market and the potential regulation of litigation funders are not new[v], the Federal Government in the past two months has sharply turned its attention on litigation funders by taking two significant steps: Litigation funding inquiry: On 13 May 2020, the Commonwealth Attorney-General announced an inquiry into litigation funding and the regulation of the class action industry. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
(It is also of note that the judge in Capic also instructed the parties in how to conduct themselves to conform to health and safety requirements, including working from home and not in their offices (paras. 4 and 5).) [read post]