Search for: "NATIONAL A-1 ADVERTISING, INC. v. DOE et al" Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
Frangopoulos kai Sia OE v Nomarkhiaki Avtodiikisi Korinthias (Class 46) L’Oréal wins decision against Bellure to prevent comparative advertising: L’Oréal v Bellure (The IP Factor) Who speaks for the European majority? [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
 24(2) analysis does not become a rule of automatic exclusion, while at the same time, the court takes fully into account the impact on the Charter-protected interests of the accused. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
But by granting the motion for rehearing, the Court has given itself more time to think about the issues. 3 Improvident grant: Aggie bonfire case Zachry Construction Corp., et al. v. [read post]
When Zoom became the part of the national lexicon in mid-March, a Vice article on March 20 revealed how Zoom’s customers’ information was allegedly shared with Facebook. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
Deandre Cortez Way et al (1709 Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions 4th Circuit: Post-purchase confused restroom users: Georgia Pacific Consumer Products v Von Drehle Corporation (The Trademark Blog) TTAB precedential no. 31: Opposer fails to prove priority, non-use, and fraud in BLACK BELT TV brouhaha (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) What happens when an opponent stops opposing: Delnorth Pty Ltd v Dura-Post (Aust) Pty Ltd (ipwars) Urgent interlocutory and declaratory relief: AED Oil Limited & Anor v Puffin FPSO Limited (ipwars) Infringement of copyright in musical works: a riff Down Under: Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited (JIPLP)   Austria Austria: opposition possible… [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
The Court refused to hear the appeal brought by the plaintiffs, which consisted of newspaper companies, the ACLU and the Shady Lady Ranch bordello, in Coyote Publishing, Inc. d/b/a High Desert Advocate et al. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:56 am
PRS Media Partners, LLC, et. al. [read post]