Search for: "NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CO. v. CORPORATION COMMISSION" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
A three-judge panel of a federal court of appeals recently grappled with these questions and determined that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission—in considering and approving the construction of a natural gas pipeline project—should have considered the eventual burning of natural gas when weighing environmental concerns. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Such funds are covered by the Securities Exchange Act (1934 Act) and are required to file disclosures with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), just like other publicly traded companies. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Seth Borenstein, The Associated Press, December 6, 2009 With the world losing the battle against global warming so far, experts are warning that humans need to follow nature’s example: Adapt or die. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
HDEC’s corporate governance also constitutes a weak point for effective anti-corruption activities. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Click Here Pacific Pipelines to pay penalty for oil spill. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
We are therefore seeing more ESG-focused securities litigation in the pipeline for these reasons. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
  The city had completely ignored the potential environmental impacts from building more parking supply, which would likely lead to more cars, more congestion, more air pollution, and more greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]