Search for: "NIXON v. JONES" Results 21 - 40 of 118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Suing Trump Over the Capitol Riot: A Preliminary Assessment
26 Feb 2021, 8:47 am by Scott R. Anderson, Joshua Braver, Alan Z. Rozenshtein
In its 1982 decision in Nixon v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
[David Post] Statistics, and How the World Works
15 Dec 2020, 8:27 am by David Post
Nixon won both Florida and Ohio in 1960 but lost the election.] [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] Should Justice Barrett Recuse from 2020 Election Litigation? (Updated)
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Jones. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] Should Justice Barrett Recuse from 2020 Election Litigation?
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Jones. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Second Circuit upholds Trump tax return subpoena
8 Oct 2020, 6:05 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In Clinton v. [read post]
Wait A Second! - http://secondcircuitcivilrights.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Leaks from the Supreme Court, Part IV: The Tax Return Cases from Roberts's Perspective
30 Jul 2020, 3:11 pm by Josh Blackman
Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Can Congress Issue A Subpoena to Federal Judges About Internal Judicial Deliberations?
25 Jul 2020, 12:17 pm by Josh Blackman
" In contrast, the courts had considered the validity of subpoenas issued to the President in federal criminal proceedings (Burr and Nixon) and in a civil suit (Jones). [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Symposium: On Trump tax returns, the latest battles may be over, but the war rages on
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm by John Malcolm
Nixon (1974) (which involved a third-party trial subpoena for a federal criminal case not targeting the president) and Clinton v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Summary: The Supreme Court Rules in Trump v. Vance
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Julia Solomon-Strauss
” And although the Supreme Court held in Nixon v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Supreme Court teaches Congress and the President a constitutional lesson
10 Jul 2020, 6:58 am by Marcia Coyle
Jones reiterated its Nixon ruling as “unequivocally and emphatically endorsing Marshall’s” holding that presidents are subject to subpoena. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
Stanford Law’s David Sklansky on SCOTUS Rulings re President Trump Financial Records
9 Jul 2020, 12:18 pm by David Alan Sklansky, Q&A with Sharon Driscoll
VANCE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, ET AL. and TRUMP ET AL. v. [read post]
Legal Aggregate - https://law.stanford.edu/legal-aggregate/
When does the House of Representatives Have Standing to Sue?: What to Expect from the D.C. Circuit En Banc Argument in McGahn and Mnuchin
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
 FEC v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Oral Argument Summary: Supreme Court Hears Trump Financial Documents Cases
13 May 2020, 6:20 am by Charlotte Butash, Hilary Hurd
Nixon. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
[Josh Blackman] Was the House Lawyer Unable or Unwilling to Provide a Limiting Principle in the Tax Return Cases?
12 May 2020, 3:58 pm by Josh Blackman
Today, Douglas Letter argued Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Supreme Court Oral Argument Preview: Trump Financial Documents Cases
12 May 2020, 4:00 am by Charlotte Butash
Trump v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
President Trump Clashes with Legal Oversight in Three Cases to be Argued at the Supreme Court
10 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Jones. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Trump’s Misplaced Reliance on Justice Department Memoranda to Protect His Financial Records
26 Mar 2020, 7:56 am by Ashwin Phatak
First, in United States v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Symposium: Vance, Mazars, Deutsche Bank: Is the president above the law after all?
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am by Neil Kinkopf
Trump v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Symposium: Mazars and Vance may be political blockbusters, but they aren’t legal ones
10 Mar 2020, 7:01 am by Brianne Gorod and Ashwin Phatak
In Trump v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Options for Dealing with a Sitting President
3 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm by Melanie Fontes
Kerner v. [read post]
Harvard Law and Policy Review - http://harvardlpr.com/