Search for: "Napa County Board of Supervisors" Results 21 - 25 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2012 CEQA 2nd QUARTER REVIEW
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162: The processing of sequential boundary line adjustments is categorically exempt from CEQA, as long as a discretionary permit is not concurrently processed. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Court Upholds Processing of Sequential Boundary Line Adjustments
30 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Napa County Board of Supervisors (April 20, 2012, A130980) ___Cal.App.4th ___. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
First District Holds CEQA Does Not Apply To Napa County Ordinance Clarifying Its Ministerial Lot Line Adjustment Practice, And That Sequential Lot Line Adjustments Do Not Violate Subdivision Map Act Exclusion’s “Four or Fewer” Limitation
23 Apr 2012, 4:10 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Napa County Board of Supervisors, et al. (4/12/12) ___ Cal.App.4th _____, Case No. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
California’s self-tying knots: Part 3, the maculate conception of RDAs
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by admin
  According to the Association’s evidence, more than 98% of all redevelopment agencies are governed by a board consisting of the county board of supervisors or city council that created the agency. [read post]
AHI: United States - http://affordablehousinginstitute.org/blogs/us
How Long Must a Notice of Determination be Posted?
14 Sep 2011, 9:20 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32 stood for the proposition that the 30-day statute is triggered when the NOD is filed, not when it is posted. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/