Search for: "Napoleon Powers v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
  On the other hand, the hard places present their own challenges: (1) Russia re-emerging to embrace a role it had started placing well in the wake of the end of the Napoleonic Wars and takes up again, to replace the United States as the shadow under which Europe may be permitted to retain its wealth if not its power, and (2) China as a rising power, not yet militarily (though that is coming) but certainly in trade which poses the greatest threat to… [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm pleased to say, though, that American law has turned sharply against attempts to punish speech that insults or even defames foreign political leaders; the old libel rules wouldn't survive New York Times Co. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 2:49 am by NCC Staff
But when Monroe arrived in Europe, Napoleon had already made a decision to sell the territory to the United States, in order to protect other French territories in the Caribbean and to finance his military efforts in Europe. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 9:17 am by Jim Gerl
Supreme Court is Fry v Napoleon Community Schools, a case involving exhaustion of administrative remedies. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Wednesday’s argument in Endrew F. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACS, Sandra Park looks at Lynch v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Clark, which asks whether “the Federal Arbitration Act preempts a state-law contract rule that requires a power of attorney to expressly refer to arbitration agreements before an attorney-in-fact can bind her principal to an arbitration agreement. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:50 am by Lyle Denniston
United States), and the power of a judge, after dismissing jurors in a case, to recall the jury for further deliberation (Dietz v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am by Kelly Buchanan
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]