Search for: "Napolitano v. Napolitano" Results 21 - 40 of 246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Amy Howe has this blog’s main report of the argument in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Chris Hajec
Hajec is Director of Litigation at the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which filed an amicus brief in support of the administration in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:37 am by SHG
*Note that the defendant in the case was Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
I am delighted to announce the publication of  "Next Generation Law: Data-Driven Governance and Accountability Based Regulatory Systems in the West, and Social Credit Regimes in China," Law &: Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 28(1): 123-172 (2018).In the contemporary world, compliance systems and policing are quickly replacing law and the traditional methods of enforcement (either organic or positive law) as the framework through which collectives (the state, the… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
These include: a Field Efficiencies Plan to be delivered to the Senate and House Homeland Security committees and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure within 270 days, providing an account of facility cost and recommendations to streamline them (largely modeled on the Efficiency Review launched by Secretary Janet Napolitano in 2009); a report on the reprogramming or transferring of funds for operational surges for the next five years; a report on cost savings and… [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm by Bernie Burk
  As Steve pointed out, Napolitano’s own website (JudgeNap.com) and bio are stuffed with references to his former job, Fox News refers to him as a “senior judicial analyst,” and Napolitano reportedly insisted that Fox make his television set resemble a judge’s chambers. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:14 am by SHG
Napolitano killed any hope the plaintiffs might have had. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
While this burden is high, facial constitutional challenges are permissible “in the presence of a constitutionally protected right” (Dickerson v Napolitano, 604 F3d 732, 744 [2d Cir 2010)[discussing City of Chicago v Morales, 527 US 41 [1999)). [read post]