Search for: "Nappy v Nappy"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2015, 6:46 am
The recent case of Nappi v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:17 am
It’s like a life sized model of the Matterhorn made entirely out of disposable nappies, and it aint Tracey Emin we are talking about here. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:59 am
Berryman v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:01 am
" Gaudin, 415 F.3d at 1035; see also Whallon v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:08 pm
See O’Connor v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
This case was wholly unlike the case of Pieretti v Enfield London Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1104; [2011] PTSR 565 (which held that the section 49A duty complements a housing authority’s duties to the homeless under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996). [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:51 am
The employee was injured during a lunch break [Nappi v Regan, 186 AD2d 855]; and 3. [read post]
23 May 2010, 7:01 pm
Like a dog owner who believes that rubbing a dog's nose in its own poo is a "learning exercise", or who allows their kid to sit in their soiled nappies as punishment, TSSG's Patrick HIndert continues to demonstrate his "fine parenting skills" with Spencer v Hartford-9. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 10:39 am
See People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In layman's terms this means that you would not call a nappy a 'baby dry' and as such the term Baby Dry is not as a whole descriptive of nappies. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Nappy v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 1:12 am
The Court of First Instance of the European Communities handed down its judgment in Joined Cases T-241/05, T-262/05 to T-264/05, T-346/05, T-347/05, T-29/06 to T-31/06 Procter & Gamble Company v Officefor Harmonisation in the Internal Market on Wednesday 23 May 2007. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 5:54 am
Since the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
