Search for: "Nathaniel Sobel" Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2019, 5:51 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Nathaniel Sobel broke down a Massachusetts high court ruling allowing the state to compel password decryption. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 8:41 am by Elliot Setzer
Nathaniel Sobel discussed what is and isn’t new in the unredacted footnotes from the Inspector General’s Russia report. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 9:01 am by Anushka Limaye
In cybersecurity news this week, Nathaniel Sobel explored the Security and Exchange Commission’s strategy for incentivizing American companies to invest in cybersecurity defenses by mandating disclosure and imposing liability on the victims of data breaches. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 12:48 pm by Elliot Setzer
Nathaniel Sobel examined whether ICE’s use of a Maryland facial recognition database is lawful. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 10:22 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Nathaniel Sobel analyzed the recent arguments in lower court proceedings of Trump v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am by Anna Salvatore
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the latest news in Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm by Tia Sewell
Jack Goldsmith and Nathaniel Sobel analyzed U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:42 pm by Tia Sewell
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon Straus summarized the latest developments in Trump V. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 9:35 am by Gordon Ahl
Evelyn Douek considered how much power Facebook’s new independent Oversight Board will have over company policy, and Nathaniel Sobel summarized a recent ruling by the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 6:21 am by Gordon Ahl
Patrick McDonnell, Jacques Singer-Emery and Nathaniel Sobel discussed the viewpoints of various legal scholars on the impeachment power. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm by Matt Gluck
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am by Anushka Limaye
On Thursday, Nathaniel Sobel took a look at how courts are interpreting the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]