Search for: "National Business Systems, Inc. v. AM Intern., Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Against this body of case law, PCCM pointed to judgments in several other common law jurisdictions, including: Ireland: C&A Modes v C&A (Waterford) Ltd which Lord Neuberger said [39] shows a “misapprehension” of the reasoning in Crazy Horse;  Canada: Orkin Exterminating Co Inc v Pestco Co of Canada Ltd, which was “of no assistance” [40] since the US-based plaintiff had thousands of customers in CanadaNew Zealand: Dominion Rent A Car Ltd… [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm by Mark Beese
Green, Director of Business Development & Marketing, Baker & Daniels Shari Harley, Owner, The Harley Group International M. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
Ct. 2131, 2144 (2016) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
No amount of corporate diktat can replace market knowledge, customer needs and reaction to the specifics of any individual national legal system and those of legal practice within it. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by MOTP
" And IB had a non-delegable duty to supervise, detect, and prevent violations of its own internal policies and FINRA rules, and to prevent harm to public investors like the Parkers, as "owners" of the trust account. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
That is how today’s “constitutional question” ought to be formulated, by contrast with the 18th and 19th century question of the constitution of nation-states. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
  Chinese State-Owned Companies and Investment in Latin America and Europe Larry Catá Backer (白 轲)[1]   Abstract: The Chinese state owned enterprise (CSOE) presents an anomaly in the operation of the well-ordered construction of a self-referencing and closed system of liberal democratic internationalism, especially as that system touches on business responsibilities under national and international… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
(See for example, MDG Computers Canada Inc. et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed this in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, where the court stated, “While the corporation is ongoing, shares confer no right to its underlying assets. [read post]