Search for: "National Home Products, Inc. v. Power" Results 21 - 40 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Electronic Arts, Inc., No. 11-3750 (3d Cir. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
”Although emanating from the Final Frontier, Spock’s pronouncement can make The Voyage Home to earthly product liability and punitive damages. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
 Among the powers specifically delegated to the federal government is the power "[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
National Drug Co., 23 A.2d 743 (Pa. 1942), long before the concept of §402A strict liability in tort was even a gleam in a plaintiff’s lawyer’s eye. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Yuba Power Products, some fifty years ago. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
Private parties are generally not required to volunteer all relevant information on the risks of their products, and government agencies tend to use their powers to access information conservatively. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
Power was understood to be plenary (and thus political) in the sense that it could extend to the management of the life, property, and liberty of individuals subject to its will.[31] Such creations (national states) were autonomous and su [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The judgement of HHJ Moloney QC in the curious international harassment case of Power Places Tours Inc & Ors v Free Spirit [2015] EWHC 3886 (QB) given on 10 December 20 [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am by WIMS
 Electric Power Supply Association, et al – Supreme Court Docket Electric Power Supply Asso. v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Congress, not this Court or the other federal courts, is the custodian of the national purse. . . [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Abitron garnered far less attention than did other intellectual property (IP) cases argued this term, including Jack Daniels Products, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin report that “[t]he Supreme Court on Monday upheld a Virginia law that prohibits uranium mining within the commonwealth’s borders, in a splintered ruling that affirmed the powers of the states to regulate mining on private lands within their territories,” in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Home Depot USA, Inc., 741 F.3d 1061, 1071, n.4 (9th Cir. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
Except, of course, that the oral argument in the case in April had left many observers wondering whether the court could get to a majority willing to overrule the 1992 Quill decision and its 1967 predecessor, National Bellas Hess Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:14 am by Kendall Gray
After the break a brief discussion of: Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]