Search for: "Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Appeal of"
Results 21 - 40
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2010, 12:16 pm
Co., 303 AD2d 987; Matter of Nationwide Ins. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 5:06 pm
Nationwide Mut. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
ARI Mut. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 5:31 pm
Marcus, 12 AD3d 329 (1st Dept. 2004) 41 daysMatter of Nationwide Mut. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:32 am
Group v Cirucci, 46 NY2d 862, supra; Adames v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
In Nationwide Mut. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 4:54 am
Co., 52 AD3d 1198, 1201, lv denied 11 NY3d 709; see also Taradena v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 12:43 pm
Mut. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:34 am
Co., 4 NY3d 468, 476 [2005]; Matter of Brandon [Nationwide Mut. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:50 pm
West Bend Mut. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 9:40 pm
In Nationwide Mut. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
Co.], 97 NY2d 491 [2002]; Matter of Nationwide Mut. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:35 am
Co. v Nationwide Mutual Ins. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:20 am
Co., 1 NY3d at 69-70 [a 48-day delay was unreasonable as a matter of law]; Matter of Nationwide Mut. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
Ins. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
In addition, "the term should . . . be interpreted in a manner favoring coverage, as should any ambiguous language in an insurance policy" (Rohlin v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:56 pm
The phrase 'used in whole or in part for business purposes' is ambiguous in the absence of any qualifying language . . . and therefore must be construed in favor of the insureds" (Roland v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 8:09 am
"As stated by the Court of Appeals in Nassau Ins. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:12 am
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34; Young v Nationwide Mut. [read post]