Search for: "Natural Resources Defense Council v. City of Los Angeles"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
City of Los Angeles (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 368, and my 4/9/20 post on it can be found here. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The City Council approved the project based upon a negative declaration following an appeal from the planning commission approval. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The City Council approved the project based upon a negative declaration following an appeal from the planning commission approval. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
David Doniger, senior strategic director of the Natural Resources Defense Council, said that EPA has given industry stakeholders “a green light to keep leaking enormous amounts of climate p [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
I had a great time presenting this to the Copyright Society of Los Angeles. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The City Council approved the project based upon a negative declaration following an appeal from the planning commission approval. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
The City Council approved the project based upon a negative declaration following an appeal from the planning commission approval. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
The City Council approved the project based upon a negative declaration following an appeal from the planning commission approval. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am
Louis to Los Angeles in 2016. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Sayoc’s emotionally fragile nature not only became infatuated with a public figure, in this case Donald Trump, but also came to view Mr. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473. stated, “despite [CEQA’s evident concern with protecting the environment and human health, its relevant provisions are best read to focus almost entirely on how projects affect the environment. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 7:15 am
In City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473. stated, “despite [CEQA’s evident concern with protecting the environment and human health, its relevant provisions are best read to focus almost entirely on how projects affect the environment. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
The Council approved of the request finding that the cottage was a public nuisance due to its unsafe condition and voted against designating the cottage a historical resource. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
The Los Angeles City Council voted to increase efforts to ease the health impacts of air pollution for schools, day cares, and senior care centers located within 1,000 feet of a freeway. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 10:01 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). [read post]
