Search for: "Neuberger v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Stulz (Ohio State University), and Zexi Wang (Lancaster University), on Monday, February 6, 2023 Tags: CEOs, Corporate governance, Public Scrutiny, ROA, S&P 500, SEC ESG in 2023: Politics and Polemics Posted by David N. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Stulz (Ohio State University), and Zexi Wang (Lancaster University), on Monday, February 6, 2023 Tags: CEOs, Corporate governance, Public Scrutiny, ROA, S&P 500, SEC ESG in 2023: Politics and Polemics Posted by David N. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Dyson referred to the four-limb test for proportionality in respect of interference with Convention rights as espoused by Lord Reed in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No. 2) [2013] UKSC 39. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:36 am
The statutory definition of ‘hereditament’ in the General Rate Act 1967, s 115(1), states that it is “such a unit of … property which is, or would fall to be, shown as a separate item in the valuation list. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
There is a risk that legislation of constitutional significance for Northern Ireland will be defeated without Parliamentary sanction. 14:53: In response to a question from Lord Neuberger, Scoffield QC directly attacks the AG for Northern Ireland’s submissions from yesterday – that the EU-related functions of the North / South ministerial council could still be fulfilled if Ireland remained a member of the EU. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale, with Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed unanimously agreeing with her findings. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
People in the United Kingdom cannot receive PCCM's closed circuit service. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:08 pm
So all member state courts, however humble, can determine matters of EU law, a state of affairs which in Lord Neuberger’s words “has important consequences. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:21 am
The appeals On this occasion, the three cases, to be heard over the four days, are all Scottish appeals: Monday 12 June, 11am – 4pmSadovska and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department This appeal relates to the evidential burden on the state when disrupting ‘sham marriages’. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
In 2005, the Egyptian Government requested that the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council include Mr Youssef on a list of persons “associated with Al-Qaida” and therefore subject to an asset freeze. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
In March 2005 a State requested that the appellant’s name be added to the Consolidated List. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical state of the… [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
Lord Neuberger in the Court of Appeal went as far as to state as follows. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
Mr Miller QC also highlighted the uncertainty as to exactly when a Defendant will be able to rely on an order for revocation in a damages assessment given that Lord Neuberger’s stated that a Defendant will only be able to rely on such an order “absent special factors”, without then specifying what those factors may be. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am
The United States Supreme Court is hearing an intriguing case this week about whether Congress can make it a crime to falsely claim having been awarded a military medal, in a case testing the reach of the Constitution’s free-speech protection. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
Supreme Court Rank was granted leave to appeal by the Supreme Court and the case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge on 21 April 2015, which can be viewed on demand on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
