Search for: "New York Times Company v. Sullivan"
Results 21 - 40
of 355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2009, 4:11 pm
From the New York Law Journal: Charney also accuses an openly gay M&A partner, John J. [read post]
28 May 2008, 12:46 pm
As noted in an article by Floyd Norris of the New York Times, a panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled in Jones v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
That argument stems from a New York State Court of Appeals ruling, Hoffman v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:35 pm
In New York Times Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 4:10 am
The certiorari petition asks the Supreme Court to reconsider the actual malice standard set out in New York Times v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 11:19 am
Sullivan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a groundbreaking ruling denying first sale protection to resellers of digital music. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
 And at the New York Times, Patrick McGeehan looks back at Kelo v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:54 pm
Glenn Greenwald has a new book out about Edward Snowden, and Michael Kinsley has a review of it in the New York Times. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
In The Dark Side of Defamation Law, a featured review in the New Yorker, Jeannie Suk Gersen reviews Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am
Gorsuch comments in his dissent that the New York Times v Sullivan judgment was made at a time when major media companies employed vast teams of editors and fact-checkers, when broadcasters required licences and when news had to be physically printed and distributed at great cost. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:10 pm
Supreme Court in New York Times v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
After months of deliberation, last week the Supreme Court declined the most recent chance to revisit New York Times v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 10:22 am
” But that’s not the real advantage of spending much of my time in Cozen’s New York office. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm
The first amendment combined with the supreme court’s 1964 landmark case of New York Times v Sullivan means that the bar is set very high for celebrities or public figures who want to sue for defamation. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 10:00 am
In 1964, the Supreme Court decided New York Times Company v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:12 am
E-Discovery 'Fiasco' Stalls Case, Hikes Costs
New York Law Journal
PSEG Power New York turned over more than 3,000 e-mails and 211,000 pages of documents to Alberici Constructors, its adversary in a suit in the Northern District of New York, but a magistrate judge has found that the energy company still failed to comply with a discovery request. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 12:28 pm
[1] See Sullivan Financial Group, Inc, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
But Harty, who lives in Florida, does not allege he intended to actually stay at the hotel, in New York. [read post]
