Search for: "Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP"
Results 21 - 24
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2024, 3:36 am
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007] [citations omitted]; see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 49-50 [2015]). [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 8:06 am
Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40 [2015]). [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
“An attorney’s conduct or inaction is the proximate [*5]cause of a plaintiff’s damages if ‘but for’ the attorney’s negligence ‘the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action'” (Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 50 [2015], rearg denied 27 NY3d 957 [2016], quoting AmBase… [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:45 am
(Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 50 [2015].) [read post]