Search for: "North Dakota v. Lee"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2016, 7:42 am
In Lee v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm
Lee, 683 N.W.2d 309, 315 (Minnesota Supreme Court 2004) (noting that, when definitions of criminal offenses overlap, `the state has the discretion to charge a person with the offense which is best supported by the available evidence and which carries a penalty commensurate with the culpable acts involved’).State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm
North Dakota. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:07 pm
North Dakota, holding that the Fourth Amendment permits the government to require breath tests (but not blood tests) without a warrant when making a DUI arrest; and Fisher v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 7:52 pm
North Dakota (argued April 20, 2016). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm
In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn Litig., Nos. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
We found a lot of cases – at least something useful from 42 jurisdictions: all except Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.As alluded to earlier, plaintiffs sometimes try to overcome inconvenient facts about a failure to read warnings with quirky arguments that the defendant should have communicated in a different fashion. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am
” Missouri: Choice of law provision selecting Missouri (where plaintiff was located) over Oklahoma (which like California and North Dakota, bars employee noncompetes and where defendants were located and where most of the conduct occurred) was enforced by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in TLC Vision (USA) Corp. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:18 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in North Dakota. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
North Dakota had done so but retreated from this unwise course in 1989 by abandoning a strict liability regime and amending its drug laws to include the culpability requirement of “willfully” as an element of the offense. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
That's what happened in North Dakota v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm
Circuit courts in the 7th (covering Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana), 8th (covering Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota) and 9th (covering Alaska, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, the Mariana Islands, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington) all ruled prior to the Supreme Court case that warrantless GPS tracking was legal. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
, North Dakota, and Utah (self-study only). ? [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Lee, University of Pennsylvania Fair Employment and the Making of a Segregationist Movement, Jason Morgan Ward, Mississippi State University Devil’s Bargain: The FEPC and the Paradox of Rights in the Welfare State, James T. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:27 am
Wyoming and North Dakota, in which the Court rejected Montana’s claim that Wyoming had breached the Yellowstone River Compact. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:00 pm
Clean Air Project v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
See State v. [read post]
