Search for: "O'BRIEN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
Cox immediately and to take all steps necessary to return to the Department of Justice the functions now being performed by the Watergate special prosecution force. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 1:36 pm
As the Department of Justice wrote in one of its briefs in Defense Distributed’s recent constitutional challenge:Even if plaintiffs are correct that computer code can serve as “an expressive means for the exchange of information and ideas about computer programming,” Junger v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
And this facial approach is rooted in longstanding precedent: In Police Department of Chicago v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
O’Brien (1968) Texas v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am
Department of Justice (Ongoing Case re. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am
Danny: And I'm Danny O'Brien. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Patricia O'Brien (left), Under-Secretary for Legal Affairs and United Nations Legal Counsel, will deliver the luncheon keynote; and ? [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:02 am
Maintenance Award Should Not Provide for an Automatic Increase upon the Prospective Emancipation of Each of Parties' Children In O’Brien v O’Brien, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4839062 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) the Supreme Court found that the plaintiff former wife had an annual income of $33,262 from all sources, and the defendant former husband had an annual income of $115,747 from all sources. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
O'Brien, No. 072312 In a conviction for charges related to attempted robbery, conspiracy to affect interstate commerce, and carrying a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence, ruling that machine-gun possession was an element of a crime rather than a sentencing enhancement is affirmed where absent a clearer or more dramatic change in language or legislative history expressing a specific intent to assign judge or jury functions, court is bound by Supreme Court… [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
Department of Justice policy has evolved to reflect this principle as well – such interference results in a Sixth Amendment (right-to-counsel) violation. ? [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
It's based on my work with the Georgia Association of Club Executives v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm
In fact, the Department of Health and Human Services recently announced a surprisingly aggressive goal of having 85 percent of volume-based provider payments moved to value-based arrangements by 2016. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:26 am
bit.ly/yNE968 (Robert Hilson) Improving Collaboration Between Inside and Outside Counsel in E-Discovery - bit.ly/yMgmik (@eDiscoveryBeat) In Civil Litigation, ';Private' Social Media Data Isn't Private - bit.ly/zN4TEq (Aaron Crews) In 'U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:48 pm
” O’Brien allegedly requested Michael Ellis to commence an additional review of the manuscript. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
O'Brien, Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C., Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
"Life's most persistent and urgent question is, 'What are you doing for others? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
